Secondary metabolite with primary consequences
Tryptophol, an aromatic alcohol produced by the opportunistic fungus Candida albicans, has long remained in the shadow of better-known pathogenic factors. However, a 2011 study 7 shed light on its interesting genotoxic potential. In organisms with candidiasis, this secondary metabolite can enter the bloodstream and come into contact with various tissues. Due to its ability to pass through cell membranes, tryptophol represents an invisible threat. Its interaction with DNA was revealed using an elegant method - the alkaline comet assay. This discovery is not only a scientific achievement but also a key to understanding the harmfulness of fungal infections at the molecular level.
Candida albicans, the opportunistic fungus producing tryptophol
The comet assay (also known as single cell gel electrophoresis) is a method that visualizes DNA damage at the level of individual cells. When a cell is subjected to electrophoresis under alkaline conditions, healthy DNA remains compact, while damaged parts "leak" toward the anode, creating a visual "comet" effect. The length and intensity of the tail directly reflect the amount of DNA damage 8 . Unlike other genotoxicity tests, the comet assay requires minimal sample amounts, is fast, inexpensive, and applicable to any cells - from bacteria to human tissues.
The comet assay involves seven key steps to visualize DNA damage at the single-cell level.
The research group conducted a pioneering in vitro experiment in 2011 on four cell lines 7 :
| Cell Line | Origin | Metabolic Activity | Significance for Infection |
|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | Human liver | High | First line of detoxification |
| A549 | Human lung | Medium | Target of inhalation exposure |
| THP-1 | Human blood cells | Low | Immune response |
| CHO | Chinese hamster ovary cells | Minimal | Control without metabolism |
Visualization of DNA damage using comet assay
Surprisingly, tryptophol showed different effects depending on the cell type. In HepG2, A549 and THP-1 cells, significant increases in DNA damage were recorded (p < 0.01). The most sensitive were HepG2 liver cells - suggesting possible metabolic activation of the compound. CHO cells, which lack enzymes for xenobiotic metabolism, showed minimal response.
| Cell Line | % DNA in Tail | Statistical Significance | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | 38.7 ± 2.1 | p < 0.01 | High sensitivity |
| A549 | 29.4 ± 3.2 | p < 0.01 | Medium sensitivity |
| THP-1 | 25.8 ± 2.7 | p < 0.05 | Low sensitivity |
| CHO | 8.3 ± 1.4 | NS | Resistance |
| Reagent/Test Material | Function | Example from Study |
|---|---|---|
| Low-melting agarose | Forms first layer for cell immobilization | 1% in PBS |
| High-melting agarose | Main gel for nucleoid protection | 0.8-1% |
| Lysis buffer | Degrades cell components | 2.5M NaCl, 100mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100 |
| Alkaline buffer | Denatures DNA and reveals damage | 300mM NaOH, 1mM EDTA (pH >13) |
| Fluorescent dyes | DNA staining | Ethidium bromide, SYBR Gold |
| Enzymes for specific damage | Detection of oxidized bases | Fpg, hOGG1 (not used in this study) |
The discovery of tryptophol's genotoxicity 7 is not just laboratory data - it has profound implications for understanding the pathogenesis of fungal infections. If Candida in the body produces tryptophol, it may contribute to chronic inflammation and long-term consequences such as carcinogenesis. The study is particularly valuable because it points to tissue-specific effects - liver cells (the main site of metabolism) were the most sensitive.
Which exact tryptophol metabolite causes DNA damage?
Vaginal epithelium and keratinocytes are first lines of defense against Candida - should genotoxicity be tested on them?
Can blocking tryptophol synthesis be a new treatment strategy?