Radiation Therapy Revolution

New Approaches in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

Precision Over Maximization

The treatment of head and neck tumors is undergoing a paradigm shift. At the 2022 annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), maximum therapy intensity was no longer the focus, but rather intelligent precision 1 7 . New studies show how strategic de-escalation, combined immunotherapies, and targeted molecular approaches can improve treatment outcomes while reducing burdensome side effects.

Key Highlights
  • Radiation alone effective for nasopharyngeal cancer
  • Sequential immunotherapy shows better outcomes
  • Molecular targets like Xevinapant show promise

1. Therapy De-escalation: Less is More

1.1 Radiation Therapy Alone for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The multicenter phase III study by Ma et al. represents a milestone: For intermediate-risk nasopharyngeal carcinomas (stage II and T3N0M0), radiation therapy alone was not inferior to combined radiochemotherapy with cisplatin 1 9 . After 41 months follow-up, the 3-year survival rates in both groups were over 90%.

Key Comparison of Side Effects
Side Effect Radiochemotherapy Radiation Alone
Grade 3-4 Vomiting 14.8% 1.2%
Grade 3-4 Anorexia 29.9% 4.8%
Grade 3-4 Mucositis 18.9% 9.7%
DIREKHT Study Focus

The Phase II DIREKHT study tested individualized reduction of radiation dose and volume in adjuvant therapy. While excellent locoregional control rates were achieved overall, subgroup analysis revealed an increased recurrence rate for oral cavity tumors 1 .

Key Outcomes
  • Locoregional control: 92%
  • Grade 3-4 mucositis: 8%
  • Chronic xerostomia: 12%

2. Immunotherapy: Sequential Rather Than Simultaneous

2.1 Pembrolizumab: Timing is Crucial

The randomized phase II study by Clump et al. compared two approaches for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas (LA SCCHN):

  • Simultaneous: Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin + Radiation
  • Sequential: Radiation + Cisplatin → followed by Pembrolizumab 9
24-Month Results
  • Progression-free survival: 78% (simultaneous) vs 89% (sequential)
  • Overall survival: 78% (simultaneous) vs 94% (sequential)
  • Grade 3 side effects: 76.7% (simultaneous) vs 58.9% (sequential)

2.2 Long-term Data: KEYNOTE-048 and -412

The 5-year data from the KEYNOTE-048 study confirmed the durable survival benefit of pembrolizumab for recurrent/metastatic tumors 4 6 . The KEYNOTE-412 study investigated pembrolizumab in first-line therapy of LA-SCCHN.

"The 24-month and 36-month survival rates consistently show positive trends favoring the pembrolizumab group."

ASCO 2022 Report 1 7

3. Personalized Radiation Therapy: Biomarkers Guide Precision

3.1 HPV Status and ctDNA

For HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allows for early success monitoring.

"Postoperatively, ctDNA drops to zero with successful therapy - a strong prognostic sign. A renewed increase signals recurrence risk before clinical or imaging evidence appears."

Dr. Mark Persky 3
3.2 PD-L1 Testing

The detection of PD-L1 (measured as CPS score) remains crucial for patient selection for checkpoint inhibitors. Higher CPS values correlate with better response to pembrolizumab 3 .

CPS <20
CPS 20-50
CPS >50

4. Molecular Targets: Precision Strikes Against Resistance

The Inhibitor-of-Apoptosis-Proteins (IAP) antagonist Xevinapant shows groundbreaking long-term effects. In a phase II study, the addition of Xevinapant to radiochemotherapy led to:

  • Significantly improved 5-year survival vs placebo + radiochemotherapy
  • Sustained treatment response without resistance development 1 4

These results led to initiation of the phase III TrilynX study, currently underway.

For patients with rare salivary gland carcinomas that exhibit ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusions, Larotrectinib offers a highly effective option:

  • Response rate (ORR): 84% (8 complete + 13 partial remissions)
  • Median response duration: not reached after 39.6 months follow-up
  • 36-month survival rate: 82% 2

This data underscores the necessity of molecular testing even for rare subtypes.

5. Future Directions: Where is the Journey Heading?

5.1 "De-Chemotherapy"

A central goal is reducing conventional chemotherapeutics through creative combinations:

  • Immuno + targeted therapy: Anti-PD-1 + Anti-EGFR replaces chemotherapy
  • Treatment-free intervals: Pauses after initial response
5.2 New Technologies
  • Artificial intelligence: Supports radiation planning through precise contouring
  • FLASH radiation: Ultra-short high-dose exposure may spare normal tissue
AI in medicine
5.3 Integrative Approaches

Studies show: A nutrient-rich diet (AHEI-2010 index) can reduce mortality risk by 93% 7 . The combination of conventional medicine and lifestyle optimization is becoming increasingly relevant.

93% Risk Reduction

Conclusion

The highlights from ASCO and ESMO 2022 mark a fundamental change in radiation oncology for head and neck tumors. Therapy de-escalation in selected patients, sequential immunotherapy, and precise molecular approaches (Xevinapant, Larotrectinib) allow not only improved survival rates but above all a significantly enhanced quality of life. The future lies in the intelligent combination of these strategies - tailored for each individual patient.

References